The Experience Gap: Part 3
How a Complex Property Insurance Claim Gets Put on the Wrong Track
When a major hailstorm, hurricane, tornado, or wind event moves through an area, the insurance company may know considerably more about the event than the property owners it covers.
Modern insurance companies have access to sophisticated weather intelligence, geographic exposure data, and information showing how many properties they insure within affected areas. Industry technology can combine storm severity with policies in force, meaning the insurance company's active policies, to identify potentially affected properties, anticipate claim volume, and determine where adjusting resources may be needed. Some systems can perform this analysis within hours of an event.
The average property owner has nothing comparable.
A homeowner, business owner, church, multifamily operator, or agricultural property owner may know that severe weather occurred but have no idea whether a roofing system, exterior building component, mechanical system, or concealed assembly sustained damage.
That creates an enormous imbalance of information before the insurance claim even begins. It also raises a question worth asking. If insurance companies can identify severe weather and compare that information against properties they insure, why isn't that information used more proactively to alert potentially affected policyholders and encourage them to determine whether their property sustained damage?
Technology clearly allows for proactive applications. In fact, Verisk identifies quickly contacting policyholders following an event as one potential use of its storm intelligence platform.
Yet for most property owners, the insurance claim process remains reactive. The property owner must recognize that damage may have occurred, report the claim, and provide the information necessary for the insurance company to begin investigating the loss.
Ironically, that is also when some of the most important early decisions about the individual claim may begin with the least amount of information.
A Complex Property Insurance Claim Can Begin with an Oversimplified Description
The First Notice of Loss, commonly called FNOL within the insurance industry, is simply the initial report that a loss occurred. It is often the insurance company's first opportunity to understand what happened at a particular property.
For a relatively straightforward claim, a standardized intake process may gather everything necessary to get the file moving. A complex property loss is different because understanding the significance of an answer often requires knowing which questions to ask next.
A property owner might report roof damage and water entering a commercial building without realizing that those few words could potentially involve several roofing assemblies, insulation, decking, electrical components, mechanical equipment, concealed moisture, interior finishes, contents, business operations, and multiple provisions of the insurance policy.
An experienced property claims professional may hear that description and immediately recognize the need for additional questions. Someone primarily responsible for gathering initial information may document exactly what the property owner reported without recognizing everything those answers could indicate.
The claim has now entered the insurance company's system, but its actual magnitude may not have been identified.
That matters because those early details can influence how the insurance company initially evaluates the claim, the amount it sets aside internally for the anticipated loss, and the type of adjuster who receives the assignment.
Why the Initial Claim Reserve Matters
Most property owners will never see the insurance company's claim reserve, but it is an important part of the internal claims process.
A claim reserve is an internal amount established by the insurance company to reflect what it currently anticipates the claim may cost. It is not an offer to the policyholder, nor does it determine what the insurance company ultimately owes under the policy. As additional information becomes available, the reserve can be reevaluated and adjusted.
No one should expect the insurance company to know the final value of a complex property loss during the first telephone call. The problem is not that the initial reserve may ultimately prove inaccurate. The problem occurs when the potential magnitude of the loss itself is not recognized.
If the initial information makes a major loss appear relatively routine, the claim may begin with an internal financial evaluation and assignment appropriate for the claim as originally understood rather than the claim that actually exists.
As additional information develops, that original picture may begin to change dramatically. More buildings become involved, interior damage proves more extensive, contents exposure emerges, business operations are interrupted, building code requirements affect reconstruction, engineering questions develop, and anticipated repair costs increase.
The physical loss did not suddenly become more complicated. The insurance company is simply beginning to discover the complexity that was already there. Now its internal claims process must catch up.
When the Claim Outgrows the Original Assignment
Insurance companies generally operate with different levels of adjuster experience, responsibility, and financial authority. The exact structure varies by company, but a relatively inexperienced desk adjuster handling routine property claims would not ordinarily be expected to possess the same experience or decision-making authority as a senior professional responsible for major commercial or complex losses.
When a significant loss is initially classified as something smaller, it may be assigned accordingly.
The insurance company's adjuster then inherits whatever information was collected before the assignment and begins developing the file. Additional estimates arrive, more damage is documented, other parts of the insurance policy become relevant, and technical issues begin emerging. Eventually, the claim may exceed the adjuster's experience, assigned responsibility, financial authority, or some combination of the three.
The claim may then require additional supervisory review, a significant change to the reserve, greater authority, or reassignment to another claims professional.
The next adjuster inherits a file they did not develop and must become familiar with what has already occurred. Prior notes, photographs, estimates, correspondence, reports, and earlier decisions all have to be understood in context. Information may be requested again, earlier conclusions may be reconsidered, and additional documentation may be required.
If the loss continues to develop, that process can repeat before the claim finally reaches the department or claims professional appropriate for its actual complexity.
From inside the insurance company, the file may simply be progressing through an established administrative structure. From the property owner's perspective, weeks/months may have passed while they have dealt with changing adjusters, repeated questions, additional requests, and little visible progress.
When the Original Evaluation Becomes an Anchor
This is where the reserve issue becomes particularly important.
As the anticipated cost of the claim increases, the insurance company's internal financial controls become increasingly relevant. Significant changes may require additional documentation, supervisory review, greater levels of authority, or further explanation concerning why the claim has changed so substantially from its original evaluation.
Those controls serve a legitimate purpose. Insurance companies need financial oversight, and significant claims warrant appropriate review.
The difficulty arises when the difference between the original evaluation and the developing loss becomes substantial.
Instead of evaluating the claim from a clean slate using everything now known, the developing loss can remain influenced by assumptions established when considerably less information was available. Additional damage receives greater scrutiny, revised estimates generate more questions, further inspections may be requested, outside experts may become involved, and decisions may move through additional levels of review.
Having worked within the insurance claims environment, I have seen how “quickly” that process can become a bottleneck when a large or complex loss was not recognized as one from the beginning.
The property owner never sees most of it. They do not see the internal reserve discussion, authority request, management review, or reassignment process. They experience the consequences. More questions, more documentation, another adjuster, another review, and more time.
One Claim Can Become Several Moving Parts
Once a claim is recognized as complex, the number of people involved can increase substantially.
A significant property loss may involve separate evaluations for the building, contents, Additional Living Expense, business income, or other applicable coverages. Engineers, building consultants, accountants, and other specialists may also become involved depending upon the nature of the loss.
The property owner who reported one insurance claim can suddenly find themselves communicating with several insurance company adjusters and multiple outside professionals, each responsible for only one portion of the same event.
All of those components, however, remain interconnected.
Someone still needs to understand the entire loss, how the pieces relate to one another, what information has already been provided, what remains outstanding, and whether something important is being overlooked as responsibility becomes divided among multiple people.
For a property owner already trying to protect a damaged building, maintain business operations, coordinate contractors, and recover from a significant loss, becoming the central coordinator of a complex insurance claim can quickly become a full-time responsibility they never expected.
Why Early Representation Matters
This is one of the reasons Pivotal Public Adjusters LLC approaches large and complex property losses differently.
Our objective at the beginning is not simply to calculate an estimate or argue about the amount of money involved. It is to understand what kind of claim exists before critical decisions are made.
That means identifying affected structures and building systems, understanding the physical damage, recognizing which parts of the insurance policy may become relevant, documenting conditions while the evidence is fresh, and identifying areas requiring additional investigation.
A Public Adjuster cannot establish the insurance company's reserve, dictate the authority given to its adjusters, or decide which department receives the claim. What we can control is the quality of the information presented on behalf of the policyholder.
If multiple buildings are affected, that should be apparent. If business operations have been interrupted, that exposure should be identified. If contents, temporary relocation, engineering, or other significant issues are developing, they should not emerge months later simply because no one understood the claim well enough to ask the right questions at the beginning.
A significant loss should look like a significant loss from the outset.
That is not about making a claim larger. It is about accurately developing and documenting the loss so the insurance company understands what it is dealing with before weeks or months are spent discovering it one piece at a time.
The Experience Gap
Insurance companies can have sophisticated weather intelligence, property exposure information, established claims systems, adjusters, managers, consultants, and financial controls available following a major weather event.
The property owner may not even know whether the building was damaged.
Once a claim is reported, that same property owner enters a system they may encounter only a few times in their life, while the insurance company operates within it every day. That is another part of the experience gap.
Having worked claims from inside that system changes the way I approach a complex loss today. Understanding what happened to the property is essential, but so is understanding how the information developed at the property will move through the insurance company's claims organization.
The insurance company already has an entire infrastructure managing its side of the claim. On a significant loss, the policyholder should seriously consider who is managing theirs.
Coming Next
In Part 4 of The Experience Gap, we will examine why complex property losses expose the experience gap so quickly.
Multiple buildings, different types of construction, contents, business income, additional expenses, engineering questions, building code requirements, and several insurance company representatives can transform what appears to be one claim into a collection of interconnected issues.
That is where simply having claims experience and knowing how to manage a complex loss begins to look very different.
Chaos is Temporary. Control is Pivotal.
Pivotal Public Adjusters LLC
Texas Public Adjuster License No. 3264340
Industry Resources
The technical discussion concerning storm intelligence and insurance company exposure analysis is supported by industry materials from Verisk Respond, which describes combining storm severity with policies in force to evaluate potential exposure, anticipate claim volume, allocate adjusting resources, identify claims not yet reported, and support rapid policyholder contact following an event.
Additional background concerning address specific weather verification and comparison of storm information against an insurance company's book of business is available through CoreLogic Weather Verification Services.
Comments